tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2748455394666939033.post1559888087085098022..comments2023-09-02T13:39:08.998+01:00Comments on GBP Blog: Why the D2H still holds its groundGileshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02526649957798113982noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2748455394666939033.post-88459011887583443102009-03-28T13:41:00.000+00:002009-03-28T13:41:00.000+00:00Hi Pete,You are quite right - the quality capabili...Hi Pete,<BR/><BR/>You are quite right - the quality capability of the D3 at higher ISO levels is astounding - and in fact, that is the one thing that would draw my interest to it. The D2h, by comparison, really shows its limitations afer about ISO 640/800 in poor light. <BR/><BR/>But again, cameras are tools of the trade, and as we both know, the only way that a craftsman is going to produce the results he/she wants is to know the abilities and limitations of these tools.Gileshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02526649957798113982noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2748455394666939033.post-69304978854913852712009-03-23T21:28:00.000+00:002009-03-23T21:28:00.000+00:00A good read, but other photographers do not have t...A good read, but other photographers do not have the ability to work under great light or create light hence the advancement of technology being a god send for some. I used to shoot with agency D2X's at 1600-3200 ISO under flood lights and dreaded the output of the camera. The thought of shooting with a D3 at 6400 ISO in RAW was a mere dream but it has happened and it is required. On another note, AP recently ran a test citing 4mp as the rubicon on quality for the digital camera with a crop sensor.Pete Tiley / Bike rider.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16790579128104023441noreply@blogger.com